Manitoba Awards Committee
Nominations for EMS Exemplary Service Medal
Procedures
I. Nomination Form
In Section A under “identification Number”,
enter the Manitoba attendant licence number, home address
and telephone number of the nominee.
In Section A, “Years of Service”,
entries must reflect the specific years of service “on
the cars”. This time must be the time spent in duties
in which the individual is personally required to provide
emergency medical treatment to patients and is, therefore
personally subject to the potential dangers at the scene
and resulting from direct contact with the patient. This
time could include a mobile supervisory position, the job
description of which requires him/her to regularly attend
the scene and personally provide back-up and assistance
to the crews on duty.
Time spent in positions where the job descriptions
do not require the individual to come into regular, direct
contact with emergency scene and patients will not be counted
towards the ten years of “potential risk”.
Once the threshold of "exemplary" has been established;
The most straightforward nominee has been a fulltime EMS paramedic for at least 20 years at least 10 of which were in a position of risk.
This is interpreted to mean a road paramedic (or supervisor), working on a fulltime basis for a licensed public service whose regular duties involve providing emergency medical services to the public.
The variation of this is a paramedic who, because of the employment market, works regularly for two (or more) qualifying employers (part-time jobs). Still, he is specifically and exclusively a paramedic.
Another variation is where, because of the employment market, the paramedic works less than fulltime hours but that is the working hours available and his only job (i.e he is specifically and exclusively a paramedic)."
These years must not be lumped in with non-patient-service
periods (e.g. with administrative, training, dispatch, etc.
time). However the required 20 years of service must be
detailed in this section.
Section B must be completed by the nominating
authority which may be the nominee’s employer or senior
supervisor. Self-nominations will not be accepted.
II Supporting Documentation
A. Completion of the “Certification”.
Copy attached.
B. The medal may be awarded to an individual who has performed
his/her duties in an exemplary manner, characterized by
good conduct, industry and efficiency. Documentation illustrating
the exemplary nature of the nominee’s EMS history
must accompany the Nomination Form.
Documentation must confirm excellence in the
following areas:
1. Good Conduct
Conduct above reproach is fundamental to exemplary
service. Any conduct that has prejudiced or detracted from
patient care, or which has, in any manner, violated a patient’s
trust or well being, or which has brought public discredit
to the EMS profession will disqualify the nominee.
2. Industry
This section should include a brief history
of the nominee’s involvement in industry related activities,
e.g. Public relations, skills improvement, member of an
association or organization that are directly involved in
advancing the goals of EMS professionals.
3. Efficiency
Examples of efficiency could include, but are not limited
to, the following activities:
Provided a suggestion or idea that has assisted
the profession in providing better patient care.
Set and exemplary example to follow in providing
an efficient and effective service in the care for patients
and members of the profession.
Promotes a high level of pride in appearance
of unit, service and self.
III. Exceptional Contribution
An individual who cannot be credited with
any special and outstanding activity or feat of performance
may still be exemplary. That determination may rest on the
individual’s profound effect on brining his/her peers
to a higher standard of performance than they would otherwise
have reached. Being a role model by placing the good of
peers/patients/EMS before personal considerations. In achieving
a public image of “Mr. /Ms. EMS”; in having
a personal history of using initiative and dedication to
improve the overall quality of service.
There are three factors to consider for these
individuals:
The superiority of their impact on peers,
patients, or EMS generally,
The consistency of their performance/impact
in the areas being credited
The length of time over which the performance/impact
has been observed.
CERTIFICATION (see below)
Date:
TO: Manitoba EMS/ESM Awards Committee
FROM:
Re: (Name of Nominee)
As the nominating Authority for the above, I am pleased
to provide the following certification to the Manitoba Awards
Committee. I recognize that the Nomination Form, this certification,
and the specific background information I have provided
will be heavily relied upon by the Awards Committee is its
decision whether or not to recommend.
“ I certify that the above nominee has
served the named organizations for the periods stated on
the nomination Form, that during this service no serious
disciplinary action has been taken against the Nominee,
that the Nominee has served at least 10 years in a position
of risk as a front-line ambulance attendant and that the
Nominee is in every way deserving of the Exemplary Service
Medal.”
____________________________
Signature of Nominating Authority
